How to use "took longer than we thought"

What Does "took longer than we thought" Mean?

• The expression "took longer than we thought" means that something required more time to complete or occur than initially expected by the speaker and their associated group (the "we"). It implies a degree of surprise or underestimation regarding the duration of the event.
• The meaning is compositional. Each word contributes to the overall meaning: "took" (required), "longer" (more time), "than we thought" (compared to our initial estimate). However, the phrase is a common collocation and sounds more natural than alternative formulations.
• The register is neutral. It is suitable for both formal and informal contexts.

How to Use It

• Grammatical pattern: verb (took) + adverb (longer) + comparative conjunction (than) + pronoun + verb (thought).
• The phrase typically functions as part of a larger sentence, often providing context or explanation for a situation. It often follows a statement about an event or process.
• The components cannot be separated without altering the meaning or grammatical correctness.
• What sounds unnatural: Using a different verb in place of "took" (e.g., "lasted longer than we thought"), or altering the structure of the comparative clause (e.g., "took more long than we thought").

Real-World Examples

These examples are sourced from took longer than we thought on Ludwig.guru.

""That process took longer than we thought, but there was no reason to rush through it"." — The New York Times

"The recovery is taking longer than we thought." — The New York Times

""It's taken longer than we thought," he added." — The New York Times

""It will take longer than we thought to go digital"." — The New Yorker

""We hadn't realised we'd be doing this in the monsoon period," she says, "so it's taken longer than we thought"." — The Guardian - Arts

Examples sourced from https://ludwig.guru/s/took+longer+than+we+thought

Similar Phrases and Alternatives

Phrase	Context
took more time than we anticipated	Slightly more formal alternative.
was more time-consuming than expected	Emphasizes the activity's inherent duration.
ran over schedule	More direct, often used in project management.
was a longer process than we had foreseen	More formal and emphasizes planning.
dragged on	Suggests the process was tedious or unwelcome.
exceeded our expectations for time	Formal, emphasizes a specific comparison to original estimates.
proved to be more protracted than we imagined	Very formal and emphasizes the length of the process.

Common Mistakes

• Learners often incorrectly substitute 'took' with 'lasted' or 'was', which, while conveying similar meaning, are not the idiomatic collocations in this context.
• Using the wrong comparative form, such as "took more long than we thought" instead of "took longer than we thought".
• Incorrectly conjugating the verb "think" (e.g., "took longer than we thinked").

Quick-Reference Summary

Expression	Meaning	Grammatical Pattern	Register
took longer than we thought	Required more time than initially expected.	verb + adverb + comparative conjunction + pronoun + verb	Neutral

FAQs

Can the words in "took longer than we thought" be separated?

No, the phrase "took longer than we thought" functions as a unit and the words cannot be separated without changing the meaning or making the sentence grammatically incorrect. The structure is fixed for this common expression.

---

How is "took longer than we thought" different from "lasted longer than we thought"?

While "lasted longer than we thought" is understandable, "took longer than we thought" is the more idiomatic and commonly used phrasing. "Took" implies an active process requiring time, whereas "lasted" focuses more on the duration itself. Therefore, "took longer than we thought" is the preferred choice.

---

Is it correct to say "was longer than we thought" instead of "took longer than we thought"?

No, "was longer than we thought" is not the correct idiomatic expression. The common and correct phrasing is "took longer than we thought." While "was longer" might convey a similar general idea, it doesn't have the same natural flow or idiomatic weight as the standard phrase.