"But is it possible to just disappear?" — The Guardian - Lifestyle
"But is it possible to be both?" — Vice
"How is it possible to achieve this kind of growth?" — eLife
"Is it possible to be too clean?" — The New York Times - Science
"Is it possible to ever comprehend it?" — The New Yorker
Examples sourced from https://ludwig.guru/s/is+it+possible+to
| Phrase | Context |
|---|---|
| is it feasible to | More formal and emphasizes practicality. |
| is it likely to | Focuses on the probability of something occurring. |
| can you | More direct and informal, often used to request assistance. |
| is there a way to | Implies a search for a method or solution. |
| would it be possible to | More polite and formal, expressing a request or suggestion. |
| is it within the realm of possibility to | Very formal and emphasizes the outer limits of what's conceivable. |
| is it conceivable to | Formal; focuses on whether something is imaginable or thinkable. |
| Expression | Meaning | Grammatical Pattern | Register |
|---|---|---|---|
| is it possible to | Expressing a question about the feasibility or likelihood of something | "is it possible to" + base form of verb | Neutral |
No, the phrase "is it possible to" functions as a unit and should not be separated. Inserting words within the phrase would disrupt its grammatical structure and meaning.
While both phrases inquire about possibility, "is it possible to" generally questions the feasibility of something in a broader sense, while "can you" is more direct and often used to request assistance or ask about someone's ability. For example, "Is it possible to travel to Mars?" explores the general feasibility, whereas "Can you help me with this?" is a direct request.
A frequent mistake is using the gerund (-ing form) after "to" instead of the base form of the verb. For example, saying "Is it possible to going?" is incorrect. The correct structure is "is it possible to" + base form of the verb, so you should say "Is it possible to go?" instead.
Tools