Ludwig is an AI-powered English writing assistant that helps you find example sentences, check grammar, and improve your writing using reliable sources from reputable publications.

Is Ludwig free to use?

Ludwig offers both free and premium plans. The free plan provides basic access to our features, while the premium plan unlocks advanced tools, unlimited searches, and additional writing assistance features.

How does Ludwig help with English learning?

Ludwig provides contextual example sentences from reliable sources like The New York Times, BBC, and academic publications, helping you understand how words and phrases are used in real-world contexts. This improves both writing fluency and comprehension skills.

Ludwig is trusted by students, teachers, researchers, and professionals worldwide. It's used by top universities including MIT, Stanford, Harvard, and Oxford, as well as professionals in tech companies like Adobe.

What makes Ludwig different from other writing tools?

Ludwig focuses on providing real example sentences from authoritative sources, not just grammar checking. This contextual approach helps users understand not just what's correct, but how language is actually used by native speakers and professional writers.

Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

You should have received
Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence "you should have received" is correct and can be used in written English
You can use this phrase when speaking or writing about something that was meant to have been received at some point in the past but has not yet been received. For example, "I sent you an email yesterday morning - you should have received it by now."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Table of contents

Usage summary

Human-verified examples

Expert writing tips

Linguistic context

Ludwig's wrap-up

Alternative expressions

FAQs

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

22 human-written examples

However, the company's communications- fell short and it admits you should have received a letter.

News & Media

The Guardian - Money

(You should have received this offer by email, but if not, the details are online).

News & Media

The Guardian - Tech

However, you have to pay tax on interest you should have received if the person or business defaults on the loan (something the industry is lobbying to change).

News & Media

Independent

You should have received at least six potatoes on your plate, but only three were present by the time it arrived at your table.

News & Media

The Guardian - Lifestyle

The retirement plan comparative chart that you should have received contains three major sections: performance for variable and fixed-return investments, fee and expense information, and annuity information (if that's part of your plan).

News & Media

The New York Times

The top scores were: NotThePubThePark +7 Steve Ellis +6.76 lcprestes +6.13 Lindsey6677 +5.13 TheVic +4.79 Bigboozer +4.17 hubertfarnsworth +4.17 Mulldog +4.13 NotThePub, you should have received an email from us about arranging your prize.

News & Media

The Guardian - Sport

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

38 human-written examples

You should've received a lot more by now".

News & Media

The New York Times

Without transparency, songwriters will conclude that the royalties they should've received remain in YouTube's black box.

News & Media

The Guardian

This is a winner and should've received more.

News & Media

Huffington Post

Trump once publicly opined that the tabloid should've received a Pulitzer Prize.

News & Media

Huffington Post

In those places I should've received help, I saw none.

News & Media

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

✓ Best practice

When using the phrase, ensure the context makes it clear what the subject should have received, and from whom. Avoid ambiguity by specifying the source and the item if it is not already clear.

⚠ Common error

Avoid using "you should of received"; the correct form is "you should have received". The 'have' indicates the past perfect tense.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Linguistic Context

The phrase "you should have received" is a modal construction that expresses an expectation or assumption about a past event. It indicates that something was supposed to have been delivered or obtained by the recipient. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Common

✓ Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Wiki

18%

Formal & Business

12%

⚠ Less common in

Science

Encyclopedias

Reference

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "you should have received" is a common and grammatically sound phrase used to express an expectation that something was delivered in the past. As confirmed by Ludwig, this phrase is suitable for various contexts, though it is most prevalent in news and media. When using it, ensure the context clearly indicates what should have been received and from whom. Be mindful of the correct tense and consider more formal or casual alternatives depending on the situation. Ludwig AI confirms the grammatical correctness, solidifying its reliability in written and spoken English.

Alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

you should've gotten

A contracted, more informal version of the original phrase.

you were due to receive

This alternative emphasizes a scheduled expectation.

you were supposed to get

This alternative is less formal and more conversational.

you were slated to receive

Emphasizes a scheduled or planned delivery.

you ought to have gotten

This alternative is less formal and uses "gotten" instead of "received".

you were expected to have

This alternative focuses on possession rather than the act of receiving.

More alternative expressions(6)

you should have achieved

you should have incorporated

you should have reached

you should have removed

you should have given

you should have reported

FAQs

How can I rephrase "you should have received" in a more formal way?

You can use alternatives like "it was anticipated that you would receive" or "it was arranged for you to receive" for a more formal tone.

What's a more casual alternative to "you should have received"?

For a less formal tone, you can say "you were supposed to get" or "you should've gotten".

When is it appropriate to use "you should have received"?

Use "you should have received" when you expect someone to have gotten something already, but you're not entirely sure if they did. It's often used when following up on a sent item.

What's the difference between "you should have received" and "you were to receive"?

"You should have received" implies an expectation based on a prior action, while "you were to receive" indicates a scheduled or planned delivery. For instance, "You should have received the email" suggests it was sent, whereas "You were to receive the package today" indicates a scheduled arrival.

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Continue with Googlefor free

Continue with emailfor free

Table of contents

Usage summary

Human-verified examples

Expert writing tips

Linguistic context

Ludwig's wrap-up

Alternative expressions

FAQs

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences:

1-200 1k 2k 3k 4k 5k 7k 10k 20k 40k 100k 200k 500k 0m-3 0m-4 1m-1 1m-2 1m-3 1m-4

You should have receivedGrammar usage guide and real-world examples

You should have received
Grammar usage guide and real-world examples